Enforcement action · Minnesota Attorney General

Minnesota Attorney General v. TikTok Inc.

Minnesota Attorney General v. TikTok Inc. is an AI-related enforcement action involving Minnesota Attorney General. Minnesota Attorney General Keith Ellison has filed a lawsuit against TikTok Inc., alleging that its addictive algorithms and exploitative features violate state consumer protection laws and harm young users' mental health.

Action details

Agency
Minnesota Attorney General
Jurisdiction
MN
Enforcement type
complaint
Document type
enforcement action
AI risk category
high
Topic
ai safety

Summary

Minnesota Attorney General Keith Ellison has sued TikTok, accusing the company of violating state consumer protection laws by intentionally designing its app with addictive algorithms and exploitative features like its Recommendation Engine and TikTok LIVE. The lawsuit alleges that TikTok prioritizes profit over the well-being of young people, leading to increased rates of depression and anxiety among youth. Ellison seeks court-ordered substantive changes to TikTok's operations, along with penalties and monetary relief, to protect young Minnesotans.

Primary source

https://www.ag.state.mn.us/Office/Communications/2025/08/19_TikTok.asp →

Frequently asked questions

What is Minnesota Attorney General v. TikTok Inc.?
Minnesota Attorney General Keith Ellison has sued TikTok, accusing the company of violating state consumer protection laws by intentionally designing its app with addictive algorithms and exploitative features like its Recommendation Engine and TikTok LIVE. The lawsuit alleges that TikTok prioritizes profit over the well-being of young people, leading to increased rates of depression and anxiety among youth. Ellison seeks court-ordered substantive changes to TikTok's operations, along with penalties and monetary relief, to protect young Minnesotans. Primary source →
Which agency brought the action?
Minnesota Attorney General brought this enforcement action in MN. Primary source →
What was the penalty?
No specific penalty amount is disclosed in the primary source AIGI tracked for this action. Some enforcement actions resolve through injunctive relief, consent decrees, or behavioural undertakings rather than monetary penalty. Primary source →
When did the action take effect?
The most recent activity on this action was published on 8/19/2025. Primary source →
Where can I find the primary source?
The primary source for Minnesota Attorney General v. TikTok Inc. is at https://www.ag.state.mn.us/Office/Communications/2025/08/19_TikTok.asp. AIGI does not paraphrase secondary commentary — every claim on this page links back to that primary source. Primary source →

Stay informed

Get every Minnesota Attorney General AI enforcement update.

Start 14-day trial →