AI Enforcement Actions Tracker

Frequently asked questions

How does AIGI decide what counts as an "AI enforcement action"?

An enforcement action is in scope when an AI system is materially central to the claim — for example, an algorithm causing discriminatory hiring outcomes, a generative model producing actionable content, an automated decision system denying benefits, or a biometric system collecting data without consent. Actions where AI is incidental (e.g., a general data breach at a company that happens to use AI) are excluded.

How quickly are new enforcement actions added?

The enrichment pipeline runs every 30 minutes against ~100 primary sources (regulator press releases, court PACER feeds, agency RSS streams). A new enforcement action is typically tracked within hours of its primary-source publication.

Are these from primary sources or news commentary?

Primary sources only. AIGI applies the Primary Source Principle: when a fetcher returns commentary, a deterministic resolver follows the link to the underlying agency document, court opinion, or consent decree, and enrichment runs on the primary content. Commentary is shown only as via-attribution.

What information is shown on each enforcement page?

Agency, case name, jurisdiction, enforcement type, document type, penalty amount and type (where disclosed), effective date, AI risk category, primary-topic tag, a neutral summary, and a link to the primary source. Detailed analysis — vendor-impact assessment, compliance-checklist deltas, risk score — is available to paid subscribers.

Can I receive alerts for new enforcement actions?

Yes. Paid subscribers receive per-agency, per-jurisdiction, and per-topic alerts via daily brief or webhook. See /pricing.

Related

• Full AI law tracker
• FTC AI enforcement
• SEC AI enforcement
• Coverage map
• Citation methodology
• Subscription tiers