AI Enforcement Actions Tracker

Frequently asked questions

How does AIGI decide what counts as an "AI enforcement action"?

An enforcement action is in scope when an AI system is materially central to the claim — for example, an algorithm causing discriminatory hiring outcomes, a generative model producing actionable content, an automated decision system denying benefits, or a biometric system collecting data without consent. Actions where AI is incidental (e.g., a general data breach at a company that happens to use AI) are excluded.

How quickly are new enforcement actions added?

AIGI monitors configured government and regulator sources on scheduled collection cycles. Publication timing depends on source availability, successful primary-document resolution, and editorial review; the tracker shows the source date when one is disclosed.

Are these from primary sources or news commentary?

Primary sources only. AIGI applies the Primary Source Principle: when a fetcher returns commentary, a deterministic resolver follows the link to the underlying agency document, court opinion, or consent decree, and enrichment runs on the primary content. Commentary is shown only as via-attribution.

What information is shown on each enforcement page?

Each record presents the fields supported by its underlying source, which can include agency, case name, jurisdiction, action type, document type, disclosed penalty, relevant dates, topics, an observational summary, and a link to the primary document.

Can I receive alerts for new enforcement actions?

Subscribers can receive reviewed briefing delivery according to their plan and saved preferences. Current delivery and API options are listed on the pricing page.

Related

• Full AI law tracker
• FTC AI enforcement
• SEC AI enforcement
• Coverage map
• Subscription tiers