Enforcement action · California Supreme Court
In re Domestic Partnership of Campos & Nunoz
In re Domestic Partnership of Campos & Nunoz is an AI-related enforcement action involving California Supreme Court. The California Supreme Court noted the issue of hallucinated citations generated by AI tools, emphasizing the need for accuracy in legal precedents.
Action details
- Agency
- California Supreme Court
- Jurisdiction
- CA
- Document type
- court opinion
- AI risk category
- high
- Topic
- ai safety
Summary
A California Supreme Court opinion highlighted the problem of AI-generated 'hallucinated citations' in legal documents. This underscores the judiciary's concern about the accuracy and reliability of information produced by AI tools, particularly within a system reliant on legal precedents, implying a need for careful human verification of such outputs. This commentary signals a high potential for future enforcement against legal practitioners who fail to verify AI-generated content.
Primary source
https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/10804474/in-re-domestic-partnership-of-campos-nunoz/ →Related California Supreme Court actions
- Governor Hochul Signs Legislation Expanding Historic Empire AI Consortium and Establishing Nation-Leading AI Protections for Responsible Growth as Part of the FY 2026 Budget press release 5/9/2025
- Grant Bauserman v. Unemployment Insurance Agency court opinion 7/26/2022
- Schlichter v. Kennedy court opinion 11/17/2025
- AG Campbell Reaches $7 Million Multistate Settlement with Nation's Largest Landlord for Anticompetitive Algorithmic Pricing Scheme that Harms Renters enforcement action 11/19/2025
- City of Boston, on behalf of Boston Public Schools, v. Meta and other social media companies agency report 7/8/2026
Frequently asked questions
- What is In re Domestic Partnership of Campos & Nunoz?
- A California Supreme Court opinion highlighted the problem of AI-generated 'hallucinated citations' in legal documents. This underscores the judiciary's concern about the accuracy and reliability of information produced by AI tools, particularly within a system reliant on legal precedents, implying a need for careful human verification of such outputs. This commentary signals a high potential for future enforcement against legal practitioners who fail to verify AI-generated content. Primary source →
- Which agency brought the action?
- California Supreme Court brought this enforcement action in CA. Primary source →
- What was the penalty?
- No specific penalty amount is disclosed in the primary source AIGI tracked for this action. Some enforcement actions resolve through injunctive relief, consent decrees, or behavioural undertakings rather than monetary penalty. Primary source →
- When did the action take effect?
- The most recent activity on this action was published on 3/5/2026. Primary source →
- Where can I find the primary source?
- The primary source for In re Domestic Partnership of Campos & Nunoz is at https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/10804474/in-re-domestic-partnership-of-campos-nunoz/. AIGI does not paraphrase secondary commentary — every claim on this page links back to that primary source. Primary source →
Related
Stay informed