Colorado SB26-189 is a bill introduced in the Senate concerning the use of automated decision-making technology in consequential decisions.

legislation United States / CO in committee 9/10

Government · Colorado Legislature

Colorado Senate Bill 26-189, introduced on May 1, 2026, aims to regulate the use of automated decision-making technology, particularly in consequential decisions. It is currently under consideration and assigned to the Senate Business, Labor, & Technology Committee, with subjects including Labor & Employment and Telecommunications & Information Technology.

SB26-189 2026 Regular Session senate

Action required

Monitor the progress of Colorado SB26-189 through the legislative process, particularly its assignment to the Senate Business, Labor, & Technology Committee.

Binding status

proposed

Governing body

Colorado General Assembly

Direction

restrictive

Sponsors

Robert Rodriguez James Coleman Monica Duran Jennifer Bacon M. Baisley B. Titone

AI technologies

predictive analytics

Affected industries

technologytelecommunicationsall

Affected roles

general counselcompliance officerhr director

Frameworks

colorado sb205

Linked intelligence briefs

Colorado SB26-189 Introduced: Automated Decision-Making Technology

Colorado Senate Bill 26-189, titled 'Automated Decision-Making Technology,' has been introduced, addressing the use of automated decision-making technology in consequential decisions [1]. The bill was introduced on May 1, 2026, and subsequently assigned to the Senate Business, Labor, & Technology Committee for consideration [2]. This development marks an early legislative step in regulating AI within the state.

"Concerning the use of automated decision-making technology in consequential decisions."

Enriched 2026-05-02

Stay informed

Get daily intelligence briefs on this and related regulatory developments.

Start 14-day trial

Important — about this brief

This brief is published by AIGI as a regulatory intelligence service. It contains general information about AI laws, regulations, enforcement actions, and policy signals across jurisdictions. It is not legal, compliance, audit, or risk-management advice; it does not establish an attorney-client, advisory, or fiduciary relationship; and it should not be relied upon as a substitute for professional counsel applied to specific facts and circumstances. Where the brief identifies “Issues for Review,” those are observations of questions a reader in a particular role might raise with their own legal, compliance, or risk function — not recommendations to act. AIGI expressly disclaims liability for actions taken or not taken in reliance on this brief. Subscribers in regulated industries should consult licensed professionals authorized to practice in their jurisdiction.

Full disclosures →