Topic · Product liability, negligence, and AI-injury redress
AI Liability
AI liability frameworks set who is responsible when AI causes harm — manufacturer, deployer, or operator — and how injured parties get redress. AIGI tracks every primary-source AI-liability rule across global jurisdictions. As of the most recent update, AIGI tracks 112 primary-source items on ai liability across global jurisdictions.
Coverage at a glance
- Items tracked
- 112
- Jurisdictions
- 8
- Last update
- 7/26/2022
Most active jurisdictions
Recent ai liability activity
- MI court opinion enforcement 7/26/2022
[Michigan Supreme Court (CourtListener)] Grant Bauserman v. Unemployment Insurance Agency
The Michigan Supreme Court found a lack of due process in the use of an automated decision-making system because it determined guilt.
Authority: Michigan Supreme Court
- CA court opinion enforcement 11/17/2025
[California Courts (CourtListener)] Schlichter v. Kennedy
A California Supreme Court case, Schlichter v. Kennedy, notes that citations appear to have been fabricated by artificial intelligence, referring to these as AI “hallucinations.”
Authority: California Supreme Court
- CA court opinion enforcement 5/19/2026
[CIGIE] St. John Family Trust v. SoundHound AI, Inc. et al
A lawsuit filed by St. John Family Trust against SoundHound AI, Inc. and others in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California, issued on May 19, 2026.
Authority: Federal OIG audit reports
- VA legislation enacted 1/13/2026
[VA Legislature] HB580: Consumer Counsel, Division of; establishing mechanisms for receiving and investigating complaints.
Virginia's HB580 expands the Division of Consumer Counsel's duties to include investigating consumer complaints involving emerging technologies, specifically artificial intelligence fraud and abuse.
Authority: Virginia General Assembly
- CA court opinion enforcement 6/11/2026
[California Courts (CourtListener)] Quinteros v. Harbor Distributing
The California Supreme Court flagged the 'evident misuse of generative artificial intelligence' in a party's 'otherwise meritless pleading,' indicating judicial scrutiny of AI use in legal documents.
Authority: California Supreme Court
- CA court opinion enforcement 6/5/2026
[CIGIE] IN RE: SOCIAL MEDIA ADOLESCENT ADDICTION/PERSONAL INJURY PRODUCTS LIABILITY LITIGATION
Federal court litigation concerning social media's alleged role in adolescent addiction and resulting personal injury claims.
Authority: Federal OIG audit reports
- MI court opinion appeal 7/26/2022
[Michigan Supreme Court (CourtListener)] Grant Bauserman v. Unemployment Insurance Agency
The Michigan Supreme Court ruled that the use of an automated decision-making system by a state agency violated due process because it unilaterally determined guilt.
Authority: Michigan Supreme Court
- OK court opinion enforcement 5/27/2026
[Oklahoma Supreme Court (CourtListener)] STATE OF OKLAHOMA ex rel. OBA v. REEVES
The Oklahoma Supreme Court heard a case concerning an attorney's use of generative artificial intelligence to fabricate legal citations in a separate District of Alabama case.
Authority: Oklahoma Supreme Court
- CA court opinion appeal 10/3/2025
[California Courts (CourtListener)] People v. Alvarez
The California Supreme Court addressed a motion concerning a lawyer's alleged failure to verify cases provided by artificial intelligence.
Authority: California Supreme Court
- NJ legislation committee 1/13/2026
[NJ Legislature] S329 (2026-2027): Extends crime of identity theft to include fraudulent impersonation or false depiction by means of artificial intelligence or deepfake techn
New Jersey S329 extends identity theft laws to include fraudulent impersonation or false depiction using AI or deepfake technology.
Authority: New Jersey Legislature
- NJ legislation introduced 5/11/2026
[NJ Legislature] A5090 (2026-2027): "Generative Artificial Intelligence Accountability Act;" imposes civil penalties on generative AI platforms engaging in harmful activity, in
New Jersey bill A5090 proposes civil penalties for generative AI platforms engaging in harmful activities, including the exploitation of children.
Authority: New Jersey Legislature
- NJ legislation 5/7/2026
[NJ Legislature] A5027 (2026-2027): "AI Accountability Act;" imposes civil liability on generative AI platforms engaging in harmful activity, including exploitation of children
New Jersey bill A5027, the 'AI Accountability Act,' proposes civil liability for generative AI platforms engaged in harmful activities, including child exploitation.
Authority: New Jersey Legislature
+ 100 more items in the full archive — start trial for full access.
Frequently asked questions
- What is AI Liability?
- AI liability frameworks set who is responsible when AI causes harm — manufacturer, deployer, or operator — and how injured parties get redress. AIGI tracks every primary-source AI-liability rule across global jurisdictions.
- How many ai liability laws does AIGI track?
- AIGI currently tracks 112 primary-source items under ai liability — spanning bills, regulations, enforcement actions, court opinions, and agency guidance from authorities across global jurisdictions.
- Which jurisdictions are most active on ai liability?
- Most active jurisdictions on ai liability in the current corpus: NY (15), CA (9), NJ (6), TX (4), AZ (3).
- How current is AIGI's ai liability coverage?
- The most recent ai liability item AIGI tracked was published on 7/26/2022. AIGI runs continuous ingestion against every active authority source.
- Where do AIGI's ai liability citations come from?
- Every item on this page links to its primary government or research source. AIGI's citation methodology is documented at /how-we-cite — we do not paraphrase or remix secondary commentary; we resolve every pointer to the underlying authority.
Related
Stay informed