Topic · Public-sector AI deployment, procurement, and accountability
Government AI Use
Government AI use rules govern how public agencies deploy AI in services, benefits administration, surveillance, and decision-making. AIGI tracks every primary-source law, executive order, and procurement standard affecting public-sector AI globally. As of the most recent update, AIGI tracks 148 primary-source items on government ai use across global jurisdictions.
Coverage at a glance
- Items tracked
- 148
- Jurisdictions
- 8
- Last update
- 5/1/2026
Most active jurisdictions
Recent government ai use activity
- WA news analysis introduced 5/1/2026
[Seattle Council] Councilmembers introducing moratorium on data centers in Seattle
Seattle Councilmembers propose an emergency 365-day moratorium on new data centers to study their impacts on infrastructure, utility rates, and public health, citing high energy demands driven by the growing AI sector.
Authority: Seattle City Council
- NY legislation floor vote 3/14/2024
[NY Legislature] A9430 (2023-2024): Enacts the legislative oversight of automated decision-making in government act (LOADinG Act)
This New York Assembly bill, known as the LOADinG Act, proposes to establish legislative oversight and regulation for the use of automated decision-making systems and AI techniques by state agencies.
Authority: New York Legislature
- NY legislation committee 5/14/2026
[NY Legislature] S10349 (2025-2026): Prohibits the department of corrections and community supervision from using artificial intelligence in parole determinations
New York bill S10349 prohibits the Department of Corrections and Community Supervision from using artificial intelligence in parole determinations, risk assessments, and supervision levels.
Authority: New York Legislature
- NY legislation committee 5/11/2026
[NY Legislature] A11320 (2025-2026): Prohibits the department of corrections and community supervision from using artificial intelligence in parole determinations
A New York bill (A11320) proposes to prohibit the Department of Corrections and Community Supervision from using artificial intelligence in parole determinations and related evaluations.
Authority: New York Legislature
- US legislation introduced 4/29/2026
[CIGIE] A bill to prohibit sales of the most advanced artificial intelligence chips to countries of concern
A bill introduced to the Committee on Foreign Affairs proposes to ban sales of advanced AI chips to countries of concern and facilitate transfer to approved US persons abroad.
Authority: Federal OIG audit reports
- US rulemaking notice comment period 3/16/2026
[SAM.gov] Sources Sought: Evaluation-Driven Artificial Intelligence (AI) Development and Delivery Support for
The Office of Naval Intelligence is seeking information and support for the development and delivery of evaluation-driven, mission-aligned AI applications for national security data workflows.
Authority: SAM.gov
- TN legislation introduced
[TN Legislature] SB2461 (GA113): State Government — As introduced, requires each department of the executive branch to develop a plan to prevent the malicious and unlawful
Requires Tennessee executive branch departments to develop AI misuse prevention plans and report to the General Assembly by Jan 1, 2025.
Authority: Tennessee Legislature
- NY legislation enacted 6/5/2023
[NY Legislature] S7543 (2023-2024): Enacts the legislative oversight of automated decision-making in government act (LOADinG Act)
Enacts the Legislative Oversight of Automated Decision-Making in Government Act (LOADinG Act) to regulate AI and automated decision-making systems in NY state agencies.
Authority: New York Legislature
- NY legislation committee 6/20/2024
[NY Legislature] A10583 (2023-2024): Prohibits the use of certain artificial intelligence models
New York bill A10583 prohibits state agencies and entities from using AI or LLMs for decisions impacting individuals' rights, benefits, or services.
Authority: New York Legislature
- NY legislation committee 3/21/2025
[NY Legislature] A7278 (2025-2026): Prohibits the use of certain artificial intelligence models
Prohibits New York state agencies and state-owned entities from using AI systems for decisions impacting individual rights, benefits, or services, mandating human personnel involvement.
Authority: New York Legislature
- US press release 2/27/2026
[GSA] GSA Stands with President Trump on National Security AI Directive
GSA removes Anthropic from USAi.gov and MAS in support of President Trump's directive to cease using Anthropic's technology for national security.
Authority: General Services Administration — AI
- IA legislation introduced
[IA Legislature] SSB 3014
Iowa Senate Study Bill 3014 proposes to mandate state agencies to inventory artificial intelligence systems, publicly disclose automated employment tools, and prohibit AI use that infringes upon employee rights.
Authority: Iowa Legislature
+ 136 more items in the full archive — start trial for full access.
Frequently asked questions
- What is Government AI Use?
- Government AI use rules govern how public agencies deploy AI in services, benefits administration, surveillance, and decision-making. AIGI tracks every primary-source law, executive order, and procurement standard affecting public-sector AI globally.
- How many government ai use laws does AIGI track?
- AIGI currently tracks 148 primary-source items under government ai use — spanning bills, regulations, enforcement actions, court opinions, and agency guidance from authorities across global jurisdictions.
- Which jurisdictions are most active on government ai use?
- Most active jurisdictions on government ai use in the current corpus: US (23), NY (10), NJ (5), MI (2), VT (2).
- How current is AIGI's government ai use coverage?
- The most recent government ai use item AIGI tracked was published on 5/1/2026. AIGI runs continuous ingestion against every active authority source.
- Where do AIGI's government ai use citations come from?
- Every item on this page links to its primary government or research source. AIGI's citation methodology is documented at /how-we-cite — we do not paraphrase or remix secondary commentary; we resolve every pointer to the underlying authority.
Related
Stay informed