Who at a technology company should track these rules?

General Counsel, Chief AI Officer, or VP Compliance at a tech company is typically the role accountable for technology-AI compliance. AIGI is designed to put primary-source updates in front of this role daily.

How many technology AI items does AIGI track?

AIGI currently tracks 1993 primary-source items where technology appears as an affected industry, spanning 8+ jurisdictions. The corpus is updated continuously.

Which jurisdictions are most active on technology AI?

Activity varies by sub-sector. AIGI's coverage map shows per-jurisdiction depth, and each item links to its primary authority source. See /coverage for the live distribution.

Where do AIGI's technology citations come from?

Every item on this page includes a direct link to the relevant government, regulator, or research document.

Industry · Foundation-model rules, platform liability, and AI-product obligations

AI Compliance for Technology

Technology-industry AI rules touch foundation-model obligations under the EU AI Act, platform liability for AI-generated content, AI-product safety standards, training-data rights, and obligations for general-purpose AI providers. AIGI tracks every primary-source AI rule affecting AI labs, cloud providers, model developers, and platform companies. As of the most recent update, AIGI tracks 1993 primary-source items affecting technology.

Who tracks this?

Typically: General Counsel, Chief AI Officer, or VP Compliance at a tech company. AIGI is built to put primary-source AI updates affecting technology in front of this role daily — with citation chains, status timelines, and obligation mapping.

Coverage at a glance

Items tracked: 1993
Jurisdictions: 8
Last update: —

Most active jurisdictions for technology AI

Recent technology AI activity

US policy paper

[OECD] A five-step roadmap to closing the AI evaluation gap

The White House outlines America's AI Action Plan for global technological dominance, focusing on accelerating innovation, building infrastructure, and leading in international AI diplomacy and security.
US enforcement action enforcement 7/13/2026

Cyber-related Designations; Cuba Designations; Issuance of Cuba-related Frequently Asked Question

OFAC designates two individuals and several entities, including a VPN service and Cuban organizations, adding them to the Specially Designated Nationals (SDN) List for cyber and Cuba-related reasons, prohibiting transactions by U.S. persons.

Authority: Office of Foreign Assets Control, U.S. Department of the Treasury
BR legislation enacted 7/7/2026

[Senado Federal] Aprovadas penas mais severas para violência sexual digital contra menores

Brazil's Senate approved a bill to increase penalties for digital sexual violence against minors, including cases involving AI and deepfakes, classifying many as heinous crimes.

Authority: Congresso Nacional (Brazil)
KR enforcement action enforcement 6/17/2026

The PIPC Sanctions Coupang and CFS for Data Breaches and Infringements on Privacy

South Korea's PIPC sanctioned Coupang and CFS with significant penalties for multiple violations of the Personal Information Protection Act, including a major data breach affecting 33 million users, insufficient security, delayed notifications, and undermining CPO independence.

Authority: Personal Information Protection Commission (South Korea)
US guidance effective 6/11/2026

[CISA] Yarbo Android/iOS Mobile Application and Cloud Infrastructure

CISA warns of critical vulnerabilities (CVSS 9.8) in Yarbo's mobile application and cloud infrastructure, allowing remote access and control of a global robot fleet, and recommends immediate user updates and security measures.

Authority: Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency
TX legislation enacted

[TX Legislature] HB581 (89R): Relating to the creation of artificial sexual material harmful to minors.

Texas HB581 prohibits the creation of artificial sexual material harmful to minors, taking effect on September 1, 2025.

Authority: Texas Legislature
US regulation effective 10/13/2022

[BIS] Implementation of Additional Export Controls: Certain Advanced Computing and Semiconductor Manufacturing Items; Supercomputer and Semiconductor End Use; Entity List Modification

BIS implements new export controls on advanced computing and semiconductor manufacturing items, expands controls for supercomputer and semiconductor end uses in China, and requires licenses for certain U.S. person activities supporting IC development/production in the PRC.

Authority: U.S. Bureau of Industry and Security
US regulation effective 10/25/2023

[BIS] Implementation of Additional Export Controls: Certain Advanced Computing Items; Supercomputer and Semiconductor End Use; Updates and Corrections

This U.S. interim final rule revises export controls on advanced computing items and semiconductor manufacturing equipment to restrict China's military modernization capabilities.

Authority: U.S. Bureau of Industry and Security
BR enforcement action enforcement 1/20/2026

ANPD, MPF e Senacon recomendam que X impeça geração e circulação de conteúdos sexualizados indevidos por meio do Grok

Brazilian agencies ANPD, MPF, and Senacon issued recommendations to X (Twitter) to prevent and remove non-consensual sexualized synthetic content generated by its AI tool, Grok.

Authority: Autoridade Nacional de Proteção de Dados (Brazil)
CO legislation in committee 5/1/2026

[CO Legislature] SB26-189Automated Decision-Making Technology

Colorado SB26-189 is a bill introduced in the Senate concerning the use of automated decision-making technology in consequential decisions.

Authority: Colorado Legislature
WI agency report enacted 8/6/2026

Report from Chair

The City of Madison, Wisconsin, passed a one-year moratorium in 2025 on data center development, specifically targeting AI infrastructure siting, marking a first for US cities.

Authority: City of Madison, Wisconsin
US agency report effective 8/4/2026

The Download: US robot restrictions, and ICE’s DNA grab

FCC updates its Covered List to ban new foreign-produced advanced robotic devices and connected power inverters due to national security and cybersecurity risks.

+ 1981 more — start trial for full access.

Frequently asked questions

Which AI laws apply to technology?: Technology-industry AI rules touch foundation-model obligations under the EU AI Act, platform liability for AI-generated content, AI-product safety standards, training-data rights, and obligations for general-purpose AI providers. AIGI tracks every primary-source AI rule affecting AI labs, cloud providers, model developers, and platform companies.
Who at a technology company should track these rules?: General Counsel, Chief AI Officer, or VP Compliance at a tech company is typically the role accountable for technology-AI compliance. AIGI is designed to put primary-source updates in front of this role daily.
How many technology AI items does AIGI track?: AIGI currently tracks 1993 primary-source items where technology appears as an affected industry, spanning 8+ jurisdictions. The corpus is updated continuously.
Which jurisdictions are most active on technology AI?: Activity varies by sub-sector. AIGI's coverage map shows per-jurisdiction depth, and each item links to its primary authority source. See /coverage for the live distribution.
Where do AIGI's technology citations come from?: Every item on this page includes a direct link to the relevant government, regulator, or research document.

Regulatory intelligence

Track AI-governance change affecting technology teams.

AIGI monitors cited regulatory change and delivers decision-ready analysis. It does not monitor customer AI systems or enforce policy.

Start a 14-day trial Explore the tracker

Important — about this brief

This brief is published by AIGI as a regulatory intelligence service. It contains general information about AI laws, regulations, enforcement actions, and policy signals across jurisdictions. It is not legal, compliance, audit, or risk-management advice; it does not establish an attorney-client, advisory, or fiduciary relationship; and it should not be relied upon as a substitute for professional counsel applied to specific facts and circumstances. Where the brief identifies “Issues for Review,” those are observations of questions a reader in a particular role might raise with their own legal, compliance, or risk function — not recommendations to act. AIGI expressly disclaims liability for actions taken or not taken in reliance on this brief. Subscribers in regulated industries should consult licensed professionals authorized to practice in their jurisdiction.

Terms and disclosures →