Who at a real estate company should track these rules?

Real-estate GC, property-management compliance lead, or PropTech counsel is typically the role accountable for real estate-AI compliance. AIGI is designed to put primary-source updates in front of this role daily.

How many real estate AI items does AIGI track?

AIGI currently tracks 124 primary-source items where real estate appears as an affected industry, spanning 8+ jurisdictions. The corpus is updated continuously.

Which jurisdictions are most active on real estate AI?

Activity varies by sub-sector. AIGI's coverage map shows per-jurisdiction depth, and each item links to its primary authority source. See /coverage for the live distribution.

Where do AIGI's real estate citations come from?

Every item on this page links to its primary government, regulator, or research source. AIGI does not paraphrase secondary commentary — our citation methodology is documented at /how-we-cite.

Industry · AI tenant-screening fair-housing, AI valuation rules, and PropTech disclosure

AI Compliance for Real Estate

AI in real estate touches fair-housing enforcement against AI tenant-screening (HUD, state AG actions), AI property-valuation transparency, AI-driven property management disclosure, and AI in mortgage decisioning. AIGI tracks every primary-source AI rule for landlords, property managers, PropTech vendors, and mortgage providers. As of the most recent update, AIGI tracks 124 primary-source items affecting real estate.

Who tracks this?

Typically: Real-estate GC, property-management compliance lead, or PropTech counsel. AIGI is built to put primary-source AI updates affecting real estate in front of this role daily — with citation chains, status timelines, and obligation mapping.

Coverage at a glance

Items tracked: 124
Jurisdictions: 8
Last update: 5/13/2025

Most active jurisdictions for real estate AI

Recent real estate AI activity

NY legislation enacted 5/13/2025

[NY Legislature] S7882 (2025-2026): Relates to the use of algorithmic pricing by landlords for the purpose of determining the amount of rent to charge a residential tenant

New York bill S7882 prohibits residential landlords and software providers from using algorithmic pricing to facilitate anti-competitive agreements among rental property owners.

Authority: New York Legislature
MA press release settled

AG Campbell Reaches $7 Million Multistate Settlement with Nation's Largest Landlord for Anticompetitive Algorithmic Pricing Scheme that Harms Renters

Massachusetts AG and a multistate coalition settled with Greystar for $7 million over anticompetitive algorithmic pricing schemes harming renters, requiring specific prohibitions on algorithm use and data sharing.

Authority: Massachusetts Attorney General
MA enforcement action settled

AG Campbell Reaches $7 Million Multistate Settlement with Nation's Largest Landlord for Anticompetitive Algorithmic Pricing Scheme that Harms Renters

Massachusetts AG and a bipartisan coalition reached a $7 million multistate settlement with Greystar for an anticompetitive algorithmic pricing scheme that harmed renters, requiring behavioral changes.

Authority: Massachusetts Attorney General
MA enforcement action settled 11/19/2025

AG Campbell Reaches $7 Million Multistate Settlement with Nation's Largest Landlord for Anticompetitive Algorithmic Pricing Scheme that Harms Renters

Massachusetts receives $621,988 as part of a $7 million multistate settlement with Greystar over alleged anticompetitive algorithmic pricing schemes.

Authority: Massachusetts Attorney General
AU agency report enforcement 4/22/2026

RentTech platforms must stop unfair and excessive personal…

Australian Privacy Commissioner finds rental platform 2Apply illegally collected excessive personal information through unfair means.

Authority: Office of the Australian Information Commissioner
NJ legislation committee 9/26/2024

[NJ Legislature] S3657 (2024-2025): Makes use of algorithmic systems to influence price and supply of residential rental units unlawful.

New Jersey Bill S3657 proposes to make the use of algorithmic systems to influence the price and supply of residential rental units unlawful.

Authority: New Jersey Legislature
IA legislation introduced

[IA Legislature] SF 2106

Iowa Senate File 2106 proposes to prohibit landlords and providers of algorithmic rent-setting systems from using nonpublic competitor data to fix or coordinate rental prices for residential properties, imposing civil penalties.

Authority: Iowa Legislature
IA legislation introduced

[IA Legislature] SF 2106

Iowa Senate File 2106 introduces the "Iowa Residential Rent Fairness and Anticollusion Act" to prohibit price fixing in residential rental property, specifically targeting algorithmic rent-setting systems that use nonpublic competitor data.

Authority: Iowa Legislature
FR agency report enforcement 5/18/2026

[CNIL] Rapport annuel : le bilan et les actions marquantes de la CNIL en 2025

The CNIL's 2025 annual report details a record year of GDPR enforcement with €487M in fines, a surge in complaints and data breaches, and active preparation for the EU AI Act.

Authority: CNIL
NY legislation floor vote 1/9/2025

[NY Legislature] A1417 (2025-2026): Relates to the use of algorithmic pricing by landlords for the purpose of determining the amount of rent to charge a residential tenant

New York bill A1417 proposes to prohibit landlords from using algorithmic pricing software to facilitate non-competitive rent agreements for residential units.

Authority: New York Legislature
NY legislation committee 1/22/2025

[NY Legislature] S2697 (2025-2026): Prohibits the use of an algorithmic device by a landlord for the purpose of determining the amount of rent to charge a residential tenant

New York bill S2697 prohibits landlords from using algorithmic devices to determine residential rent, classifying such use as an unfair or deceptive trade practice.

Authority: New York Legislature
AU guidance effective 3/2/2026

Handling privacy complaints – a new approach for a new era

Australia's OAIC announces a new enforcement-focused approach to privacy complaints, including proactive investigations into new technologies and the use of new powers like infringement notices.

Authority: Office of the Australian Information Commissioner

+ 112 more — start trial for full access.

Frequently asked questions

Which AI laws apply to real estate?: AI in real estate touches fair-housing enforcement against AI tenant-screening (HUD, state AG actions), AI property-valuation transparency, AI-driven property management disclosure, and AI in mortgage decisioning. AIGI tracks every primary-source AI rule for landlords, property managers, PropTech vendors, and mortgage providers.
Who at a real estate company should track these rules?: Real-estate GC, property-management compliance lead, or PropTech counsel is typically the role accountable for real estate-AI compliance. AIGI is designed to put primary-source updates in front of this role daily.
How many real estate AI items does AIGI track?: AIGI currently tracks 124 primary-source items where real estate appears as an affected industry, spanning 8+ jurisdictions. The corpus is updated continuously.
Which jurisdictions are most active on real estate AI?: Activity varies by sub-sector. AIGI's coverage map shows per-jurisdiction depth, and each item links to its primary authority source. See /coverage for the live distribution.
Where do AIGI's real estate citations come from?: Every item on this page links to its primary government, regulator, or research source. AIGI does not paraphrase secondary commentary — our citation methodology is documented at /how-we-cite.

Stay informed

Daily briefs on real estate AI compliance.

Start 14-day trial →

Important — about this brief

This brief is published by AIGI as a regulatory intelligence service. It contains general information about AI laws, regulations, enforcement actions, and policy signals across jurisdictions. It is not legal, compliance, audit, or risk-management advice; it does not establish an attorney-client, advisory, or fiduciary relationship; and it should not be relied upon as a substitute for professional counsel applied to specific facts and circumstances. Where the brief identifies “Issues for Review,” those are observations of questions a reader in a particular role might raise with their own legal, compliance, or risk function — not recommendations to act. AIGI expressly disclaims liability for actions taken or not taken in reliance on this brief. Subscribers in regulated industries should consult licensed professionals authorized to practice in their jurisdiction.

Full disclosures →