Who at a education company should track these rules?

K-12 district counsel, university CIO, or ed-tech General Counsel is typically the role accountable for education-AI compliance. AIGI is designed to put primary-source updates in front of this role daily.

How many education AI items does AIGI track?

AIGI currently tracks 330 primary-source items where education appears as an affected industry, spanning 8+ jurisdictions. The corpus is updated continuously.

Which jurisdictions are most active on education AI?

Activity varies by sub-sector. AIGI's coverage map shows per-jurisdiction depth, and each item links to its primary authority source. See /coverage for the live distribution.

Where do AIGI's education citations come from?

Every item on this page includes a direct link to the relevant government, regulator, or research document.

Industry · Classroom AI, FERPA, academic integrity, and student-data protection

AI Compliance for Education

AI in education covers classroom AI tool approvals, FERPA implications of AI-driven student-data processing, academic-integrity policies for generative AI, ed-tech-vendor compliance, and AI for students with disabilities. AIGI tracks every primary-source AI rule for K-12 districts, higher-ed institutions, and ed-tech vendors. As of the most recent update, AIGI tracks 330 primary-source items affecting education.

Who tracks this?

Typically: K-12 district counsel, university CIO, or ed-tech General Counsel. AIGI is built to put primary-source AI updates affecting education in front of this role daily — with citation chains, status timelines, and obligation mapping.

Coverage at a glance

Items tracked: 330
Jurisdictions: 8
Last update: 1/13/2026

Most active jurisdictions for education AI

Recent education AI activity

VA legislation enacted 1/13/2026

[VA Legislature] SB394: Artificial intelligence; use of systems for student instruction.

Virginia enacted SB394, requiring the Department of Education to develop AI guidance for schools and establish a pilot program for AI in instruction.

Authority: Virginia General Assembly
NY legislation enacted 1/5/2021

[NY Legislature] A954 (2021-2022): Relates to the use of biometric identifying technology; repealer

New York law prohibits biometric identifying technology in schools until at least July 1, 2022, or until authorized, and mandates a study on its use.

Authority: New York Legislature
BR agency report effective 4/8/2026

ANPD ganha nova estrutura e se consolida como agência reguladora

Brazil's ANPD gains new structure and regulatory agency status with expanded powers under Decree 12.881/2026 and Resolution 33, enhancing data protection and enforcement of the ECA Digital.

Authority: Autoridade Nacional de Proteção de Dados (Brazil)
EU agency report 7/30/2026

[EU Digital Strategy] EU launches AI Gigafactories call to boost Europe's computing capacity and unlock more than €30 billion in investment

The EU launches a call for tenders to establish up to seven AI Gigafactories across Europe, aiming to boost computing capacity and foster AI development aligned with EU standards through €30 billion in investment.

Authority: European AI Office
KR rulemaking notice proposed rule 6/12/2026

[MSIT] Legislative Notice Issued on Amendment to the Enforcement Decree of the AI Basic Act to Strengthen Support for the AI Industry

South Korea's MSIT issued a legislative notice for draft amendments to the AI Basic Act's Enforcement Decree, establishing a verification system for public sector AI adoption, defining AI-vulnerable groups for support, and clarifying financial aid eligibility, effective July 21, 2026.

Authority: Ministry of Science and ICT (South Korea)
VA legislation enacted 1/13/2026

[VA Legislature] HJ32: Higher educational institutions; JLARC to study artificial intelligence use policies.

Virginia House Joint Resolution 32 directs JLARC to study AI use policies in higher education, evaluate them based on key criteria, and develop a model policy and recommendations.

Authority: Virginia General Assembly
VA legislation enacted 1/13/2026

[VA Legislature] HB971: College student-athletes; biometric data, protections and limitations.

Virginia HB971 prohibits institutions of higher education and other entities from disclosing student-athlete biometric data or conditioning NIL contracts on its use without explicit written consent.

Authority: Virginia General Assembly
NJ legislation introduced 6/15/2026

[NJ Legislature] S4469 (2026-2027): Requires boards of education to adopt policy on use of artificial intelligence; requires DOE to establish model policy.

New Jersey S4469 requires state boards of education to adopt policies on AI use and mandates the Department of Education to establish a model policy.

Authority: New Jersey Legislature
NY press release enacted 4/30/2024

Governor Hochul, Industry Leaders and Advocates Celebrate Empire AI Consortium to Make New York a Global Leader in Artificial Intelligence

New York Governor Hochul announced the Empire AI Consortium, a $275 million investment for AI research, and signed legislation requiring disclosure for deceptive AI in political communications.

Authority: New York State Governor's Office
NY legislation committee 1/11/2023

[NY Legislature] S1433 (2023-2024): Relates to enacting the "social media monitoring safety act"; appropriation

This bill, known as the "social media monitoring safety act," would provide data analytic resources and funding to New York school districts for social media monitoring to detect threats to student health and school safety.

Authority: New York Legislature
MN agency report effective 7/28/2025

New Minnesota law creates stronger privacy protections for residents

Minnesota's new Consumer Data Privacy Act (MCDPA) takes effect July 31, 2025, granting residents expanded rights over personal data, including the ability to opt-out of profiling and question automated AI decisions.

Authority: Minnesota Attorney General
US guidance effective 8/5/2025

[HHS OCR] Supporting Fairness and Originality in NIH Research Applications

NIH issues guidance on appropriate AI use in research applications to ensure fairness and originality, and implements a new annual application limit per principal investigator.

Authority: HHS Office for Civil Rights

+ 318 more — start trial for full access.

Frequently asked questions

Which AI laws apply to education?: AI in education covers classroom AI tool approvals, FERPA implications of AI-driven student-data processing, academic-integrity policies for generative AI, ed-tech-vendor compliance, and AI for students with disabilities. AIGI tracks every primary-source AI rule for K-12 districts, higher-ed institutions, and ed-tech vendors.
Who at a education company should track these rules?: K-12 district counsel, university CIO, or ed-tech General Counsel is typically the role accountable for education-AI compliance. AIGI is designed to put primary-source updates in front of this role daily.
How many education AI items does AIGI track?: AIGI currently tracks 330 primary-source items where education appears as an affected industry, spanning 8+ jurisdictions. The corpus is updated continuously.
Which jurisdictions are most active on education AI?: Activity varies by sub-sector. AIGI's coverage map shows per-jurisdiction depth, and each item links to its primary authority source. See /coverage for the live distribution.
Where do AIGI's education citations come from?: Every item on this page includes a direct link to the relevant government, regulator, or research document.

Regulatory intelligence

Track AI-governance change affecting education teams.

AIGI monitors cited regulatory change and delivers decision-ready analysis. It does not monitor customer AI systems or enforce policy.

Start a 14-day trial Explore the tracker

Important — about this brief

This brief is published by AIGI as a regulatory intelligence service. It contains general information about AI laws, regulations, enforcement actions, and policy signals across jurisdictions. It is not legal, compliance, audit, or risk-management advice; it does not establish an attorney-client, advisory, or fiduciary relationship; and it should not be relied upon as a substitute for professional counsel applied to specific facts and circumstances. Where the brief identifies “Issues for Review,” those are observations of questions a reader in a particular role might raise with their own legal, compliance, or risk function — not recommendations to act. AIGI expressly disclaims liability for actions taken or not taken in reliance on this brief. Subscribers in regulated industries should consult licensed professionals authorized to practice in their jurisdiction.

Terms and disclosures →