Who at a education company should track these rules?

K-12 district counsel, university CIO, or ed-tech General Counsel is typically the role accountable for education-AI compliance. AIGI is designed to put primary-source updates in front of this role daily.

How many education AI items does AIGI track?

AIGI currently tracks 297 primary-source items where education appears as an affected industry, spanning 8+ jurisdictions. The corpus is updated continuously.

Which jurisdictions are most active on education AI?

Activity varies by sub-sector. AIGI's coverage map shows per-jurisdiction depth, and each item links to its primary authority source. See /coverage for the live distribution.

Where do AIGI's education citations come from?

Every item on this page links to its primary government, regulator, or research source. AIGI does not paraphrase secondary commentary — our citation methodology is documented at /how-we-cite.

Industry · Classroom AI, FERPA, academic integrity, and student-data protection

AI Compliance for Education

AI in education covers classroom AI tool approvals, FERPA implications of AI-driven student-data processing, academic-integrity policies for generative AI, ed-tech-vendor compliance, and AI for students with disabilities. AIGI tracks every primary-source AI rule for K-12 districts, higher-ed institutions, and ed-tech vendors. As of the most recent update, AIGI tracks 297 primary-source items affecting education.

Who tracks this?

Typically: K-12 district counsel, university CIO, or ed-tech General Counsel. AIGI is built to put primary-source AI updates affecting education in front of this role daily — with citation chains, status timelines, and obligation mapping.

Coverage at a glance

Items tracked: 297
Jurisdictions: 8
Last update: 1/13/2026

Most active jurisdictions for education AI

Recent education AI activity

VA legislation enacted 1/13/2026

[VA Legislature] SB394: Artificial intelligence; use of systems for student instruction.

Virginia enacted SB394, requiring the Department of Education to develop AI guidance for schools and establish a pilot program for AI in instruction.

Authority: Virginia General Assembly
NY legislation enacted 1/5/2021

[NY Legislature] A954 (2021-2022): Relates to the use of biometric identifying technology; repealer

New York law prohibits biometric identifying technology in schools until at least July 1, 2022, or until authorized, and mandates a study on its use.

Authority: New York Legislature
BR agency report effective 4/8/2026

ANPD ganha nova estrutura e se consolida como agência reguladora

Brazil's ANPD gains new structure and regulatory agency status with expanded powers under Decree 12.881/2026 and Resolution 33, enhancing data protection and enforcement of the ECA Digital.

Authority: Autoridade Nacional de Proteção de Dados (Brazil)
KR rulemaking notice proposed rule 6/12/2026

[MSIT] Legislative Notice Issued on Amendment to the Enforcement Decree of the AI Basic Act to Strengthen Support for the AI Industry

South Korea's MSIT issued a legislative notice for draft amendments to the AI Basic Act's Enforcement Decree, establishing a verification system for public sector AI adoption, defining AI-vulnerable groups for support, and clarifying financial aid eligibility, effective July 21, 2026.

Authority: Ministry of Science and ICT (South Korea)
VA legislation enacted 1/13/2026

[VA Legislature] HJ32: Higher educational institutions; JLARC to study artificial intelligence use policies.

Virginia House Joint Resolution 32 directs JLARC to study AI use policies in higher education, evaluate them based on key criteria, and develop a model policy and recommendations.

Authority: Virginia General Assembly
VA legislation enacted 1/13/2026

[VA Legislature] HB971: College student-athletes; biometric data, protections and limitations.

Virginia HB971 prohibits institutions of higher education and other entities from disclosing student-athlete biometric data or conditioning NIL contracts on its use without explicit written consent.

Authority: Virginia General Assembly
NJ legislation introduced 6/11/2026

[NJ Legislature] S4469 (2026-2027): Requires boards of education to adopt policy on use of artificial intelligence; requires DOE to establish model policy.

New Jersey S4469 requires state boards of education to adopt policies on AI use and mandates the Department of Education to establish a model policy.

Authority: New Jersey Legislature
NY press release enacted 4/30/2024

Governor Hochul, Industry Leaders and Advocates Celebrate Empire AI Consortium to Make New York a Global Leader in Artificial Intelligence

New York Governor Hochul announced the Empire AI Consortium, a $275 million investment for AI research, and signed legislation requiring disclosure for deceptive AI in political communications.

Authority: New York State Governor's Office
NY legislation committee 1/11/2023

[NY Legislature] S1433 (2023-2024): Relates to enacting the "social media monitoring safety act"; appropriation

This bill, known as the "social media monitoring safety act," would provide data analytic resources and funding to New York school districts for social media monitoring to detect threats to student health and school safety.

Authority: New York Legislature
MN agency report effective 7/28/2025

New Minnesota law creates stronger privacy protections for residents

Minnesota's new Consumer Data Privacy Act (MCDPA) takes effect July 31, 2025, granting residents expanded rights over personal data, including the ability to opt-out of profiling and question automated AI decisions.

Authority: Minnesota Attorney General
US guidance effective 8/5/2025

[HHS OCR] Supporting Fairness and Originality in NIH Research Applications

NIH issues guidance on appropriate AI use in research applications to ensure fairness and originality, and implements a new annual application limit per principal investigator.

Authority: HHS Office for Civil Rights
EU news analysis effective 5/7/2026

[EU Digital Strategy] EU agrees to simplify AI rules to boost innovation and ban ‘nudification' apps to protect citizens

The European Commission announced a political agreement to simplify the EU AI Act's rules, setting clear implementation timelines for high-risk AI systems and banning 'nudification' apps.

Authority: European AI Office

+ 285 more — start trial for full access.

Frequently asked questions

Which AI laws apply to education?: AI in education covers classroom AI tool approvals, FERPA implications of AI-driven student-data processing, academic-integrity policies for generative AI, ed-tech-vendor compliance, and AI for students with disabilities. AIGI tracks every primary-source AI rule for K-12 districts, higher-ed institutions, and ed-tech vendors.
Who at a education company should track these rules?: K-12 district counsel, university CIO, or ed-tech General Counsel is typically the role accountable for education-AI compliance. AIGI is designed to put primary-source updates in front of this role daily.
How many education AI items does AIGI track?: AIGI currently tracks 297 primary-source items where education appears as an affected industry, spanning 8+ jurisdictions. The corpus is updated continuously.
Which jurisdictions are most active on education AI?: Activity varies by sub-sector. AIGI's coverage map shows per-jurisdiction depth, and each item links to its primary authority source. See /coverage for the live distribution.
Where do AIGI's education citations come from?: Every item on this page links to its primary government, regulator, or research source. AIGI does not paraphrase secondary commentary — our citation methodology is documented at /how-we-cite.

Stay informed

Daily briefs on education AI compliance.

Start 14-day trial →

Important — about this brief

This brief is published by AIGI as a regulatory intelligence service. It contains general information about AI laws, regulations, enforcement actions, and policy signals across jurisdictions. It is not legal, compliance, audit, or risk-management advice; it does not establish an attorney-client, advisory, or fiduciary relationship; and it should not be relied upon as a substitute for professional counsel applied to specific facts and circumstances. Where the brief identifies “Issues for Review,” those are observations of questions a reader in a particular role might raise with their own legal, compliance, or risk function — not recommendations to act. AIGI expressly disclaims liability for actions taken or not taken in reliance on this brief. Subscribers in regulated industries should consult licensed professionals authorized to practice in their jurisdiction.

Full disclosures →